Josiah wrote:Willyz, for starters you can't use your very specific time and place to base a generalize argument that sweeps a global scale.*
Secondly, are you referring to cover bands? $50 for a "bar gig" sounds like a cover band.
No offense, but that's totally outside the argument and frankly if you don't make money playing covers. Boo Hoo. It's a COVER BAND.
*Also I'm sorry it seems that bad, but that might also just be you, that specific area, a slump for that area, who knows. I live in a TINY city compared to Austin and easily make $100/night for any number of cover bands. Granted at 4 sets, that's only $25/hour, but none the less. Churches pay way better, but that's whole different conversation.
How many artists on iTunes? Were more people then that selling their music BEFORE iTunes?
Come on man. There is an astounding number of artists and musicians pushing their products, SELLING THEM, on the market. WAY more then pre-internet and modern technology.
There's many many many times more musicians and artists making money off their music then ever before. You need to understand that fact. First.
Now move on to the crux of the conversation - the musicians aren't making AS MUCH. AS MUCH is the important part.
You know what takes money away from musicians though? Controlling the radio and media to only allow your particular pop artists into the open market. It's not the teenagers at home downloading FooFighters keeping your music off the radio.
Go try and get a song played on the radio, you'll find out real fucking quick the who what and why nobody's making money.
(Edited the post down to focus on certain points)
Okay, so I'm less of a musician because I get hired to play in bands that play covers? Or is that a whole other argument? Honestly, I usually don't take original gigs because they don't pay and frankly the music is rarely anything good. I get hired because I can transcribe the tunes note for note, play them well without having to rehearse with the band (in case they're in a crunch), and they know what they're going to get. And no, I hardly take the $50 or less gigs anymore, covers or original. It's just not worth the hastle. Parking has become more of an issue here in Austin, certain parts of downtown get blocked off (on weekends) by police for safety of the hoard of drunk people, and it's very difficult to get around.
$100 a night for a bar gig? Your tiny town seems great. Is it a town full of musicians like it is here where there's so many people willing to play for nothing or next to nothing (quality isn't exactly a factor)? For the most part, I'm only playing with my band these days. It's a business run with me and two other members, we're playing covers and originals, we have merch that we know sells, and we only take club/bar gigs if we know the venue can will pull in a crowd and obviously, if they're willing to pay us a reasonable amount (usually $50-$100 a man for two 50 minute sets, but the venues usually only do the gig once a month). I know my band mates are going to play well, the gig will be hassle free, I'm getting good pay, and it's going to be fun. Why is mixing business/professionalism with the pleasure of playing great music (original or not) with great players as well as friends frowned upon so?
You're right, it is much, much easier for an indie artist to put their stuff online and make some money from it, assuming it sells. Anybody can half-ass a record on their laptop and get it on iTunes. Doesn't make it a good record though. And you're right about the radio thing too. People get spoon fed so much crap and the companies mass produce more junk. I'd argue a lot of that began (while I'm sure it's always been going on to some extent) in the 90's with the Britney Spears/boy band phase, and the same mass-produced thing started to happen with nu-metal/alt bands too (your Shinedowns and what not).
Granted, yes, we're all in different parts of the world and different markets. But I do believe that there is a correlation between the amount of money musicians make and the decline of physical media sales/online culture. I've personally expereinced this regression in the last four years.
This is, as always, a very interesting discussion- I'm glad that we have HOD to be able to talk about this stuff with actual players that respect one another.
EDIT: I mean, look at this example: Eric Clapton hires Steve Gadd, Abe Jr, Steve Jordan, Ian Thomas, etc to play in his band. Those guys didn't write any of the tunes that they're playing with Eric. They're playing covers, essentially. Granted it's a much bigger scale than our level, but still... are those drummers less musicians because they're playing someone else's music?