sejuba wrote:Deseipel, no offense taken but I must clarify a few points. i had never heard of these guys before until the concerts. i got to know Tony, the dude who plays baritone sax in this band. That being said, all concerts were FREE.
They also did a series of FREE workshops at our state university as well as visiting poor cities and spending time with the local communities (hey, by poor I mean 3rd world poor). This piece they are tying to record is at least 1 hour long and is quite complex, i might add. I'm telling you man, some of these guys are VERY YOUNG. I honestly can't say if they are rich or not, and I don't care either. My opinion is simple: if you spend A LOT of time developing, creating,perfecting something worthwile for other people to enjoy and appreciate, than it just makes sense you should get paid. How you get the money is not really the question. Screw piracy, support GREAT and HONEST music. Its not about helping America's economy, its about the music. That being said though, I sincerely understand where you were coming from, and to a certain extent, you're right.
Regarding the free concerts, a couple of thoughts: 1) I traveled in a Jazz band in college and I wasn't paid either. But that's because it was a school-sponsored thing. And if I had to guess, that's what their tour was, which leads me to 2) the whole traveling to other colleges and educating poor communities sounds the like requirements of a NEA grant or something. Could be. I wonder if Julliard recieved some grant and then approached a student to write a piece, put a group together, tour, fullfill the grant requirements, etc. Nothing wrong with it, perfectly ok with me. go4it.
I hear what you're saying.
But their project isn't about getting paid, it's about producing an album. That doesn't mean they'll be paid for it. If the album sells, sure they might make a few bucks. But maybe not; for a couple reasons I'll try to explain.
1. If this whole piece was commissioned to fullfill the requirements of an NEA grant and the promotion/marketing was handled by Julliard, it wouldn't surprise me if the profits made from sale of the album are either 1) questionable, because you typically can't profit from the works generated from a grant (I might be wrong, but it sounds right)
2) I could see Julliard taking a huge chunk of the profits since their name is all over it and they probably funded the tour.
I need to digress and stay positive here though, anything I've written here is pure speculation and doesn't really help.