Compliance to what? Or more importantly... who?DSOP wrote:Screw openness. Let's start off by guaranteeing compliance, then we can talk about loosening restrictions.
And why should those particular entities define the rules?
Compliance to what? Or more importantly... who?DSOP wrote:Screw openness. Let's start off by guaranteeing compliance, then we can talk about loosening restrictions.
To copyright law. Dude you are really.... oh never mind.... it's really pointless trying to explain anything to you.Josiah wrote:Compliance to what? Or more importantly... who?DSOP wrote:Screw openness. Let's start off by guaranteeing compliance, then we can talk about loosening restrictions.
Right on!Gavin Harrison wrote:Here's an interesting read
http://michaelmarshallsmith.com/blog/2012/01/soft-sopa/
Gavin
Michael Marshall Smith wrote:the real, visceral and unspoken reason people are getting so exercised about this is because… well, because they’re stealing, and they know it. Virtually everyone on the Internet is making use of copyrighted materials without paying for them.
This is true and I fully agree with that but what people are worked up about is I think not that they'll have to spend an additional $ for a genuine copy of Windows 7 but that stuff like ACTA goes beyond mere software and music being obtained illegally and contains clauses violating basic human rights. Fine, charge me for music and programs but who the f*** cares if I post a tweet with someone's photo or upload a YT video with copyrighted music in the background, as long as the author is credited and I'm not doing that for profit. I don't know how much more proof do people finally need to start doubting Governmental benevolence...DSOP wrote:Right on!Gavin Harrison wrote:Here's an interesting read
http://michaelmarshallsmith.com/blog/2012/01/soft-sopa/
Gavin
Michael Marshall Smith wrote:the real, visceral and unspoken reason people are getting so exercised about this is because… well, because they’re stealing, and they know it. Virtually everyone on the Internet is making use of copyrighted materials without paying for them.
If you've ever tried to get a website to stop distributing your music without your authorization or permission, you would know why. I'm not saying SOPA is perfect, but it's a start. Too many people have gotten away with theft for TOO LONG!electrizer wrote:
As you said DSOP we have legislation regulating violating copyrights so why do we need ACTA / SOPA ?
Do you know how much trouble everyone had to go through to shut down that site? Ridiculous. That site was 100% bullshit pirates and thieves, and it took the coordinated effort of numerous agencies from numerous countries to shut them down.matthughen wrote: The owners of megaupload, a site with lots of legit users and uses, were arrested oversees, the site was shuttered and much of their assets confiscated - all without SOPA.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 40 guests